High Court ruled prenuptial agreement as invalidNovember 13, 2017
The High Court has torn up a prenuptial agreement between a wealthy Australian property developer and his online bride, who was pressured into signing the document after he threatened to call off the wedding.
The man at the centre of the case, who owned assets worth more than $18 million, died in May 2014 during drawn-out litigation over the agreement.
Two of his children, acting as executors and trustees of the estate, took over the court battle.
On Wednesday, the High Court ruled the agreement, and a similar post-nuptial agreement, should be set aside on the basis of unconscionable conduct.
The Federal Circuit Court had ruled in 2015 that the agreements were not valid but the decision was overturned by the Family Court last year. The High Court decision upholds the earlier ruling.
The lawyer said she had “significant concerns” Ms Thorne was only signing the agreement so the wedding would not be called off.
The couple separated in June 2011, less than four years after their wedding. Ms Thorne started legal proceedings in April 2012, seeking to have the pre- and post-nuptial agreements set aside. The High Court agreed with the Federal Circuit Court and said the agreements should be torn up.
“Mr Kennedy took advantage of Ms Thorne’s vulnerability to obtain agreements which … were entirely inappropriate and wholly inadequate,” the joint judgment said.
The Federal Circuit Court will now consider Ms Thorne’s application for a $1.1 million property adjustment order and a lump sum of $104,000.
Source: The Sydney Morning Herald http://www.smh.com.au/national/high-court-tears-up-prenuptial-agreement-between-property-developer-and-online-bride-20171108-gzh00q.html